INN533 - Learning Journal - Part I

Week 2 – Learning Activities + Journal Entry

Watch: “The Story of the Seven Blind Men and the Elephant”

The video “The Story of the Seven Blind Men and the Elephant offers valuable insight into how each person or user has a unique experience and each experience can be combined to be reflective of the whole. It highlights the importance or value of being mindful of every “users’” perspective. This is demonstrated when the final man in the story compiles each opinion to form a complete understanding of the experience. As mentioned at the end of the video: “Put all parts together to form an opinion” and in the case of the design process I believe this means considering all points of view before carrying out development.

Read: ‘Design thinking’ – Steven Bell

This article talks about a new thinking process for professionals to undertake in order to better understand their customers, clients, service users etc., the way their services accommodate people and how to problem solve – design thinking. Bell talks about observation and discussion being key tools in the design thinking/ user experience evaluation process and outlines cases where design thinking has been applied. It was interesting to read about the concept being used in library contexts and how the idea and design thinking community is growing.

Bell, S. (2008) Design thinking. http://stevenbell.info/pdfs/ALdesignarticle.pdf

Do: Observe and interview one (1) individual using an information system. What questions will you ask? What tasks will you observe them doing? Why? 

For the ‘Do’ activity I chose to observe and interview my sister using the Gold Coast Libraries catalogue to find a copy of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix in audiobook format. I selected this task because it’s something my sister hasn’t done before. It’s also a process that I’ve completed but with some challenges so I was interested to make note of these challenges instead of doing what I usually do which is if one idea doesn’t work, try another.

Step-by-step process/ observations/ discussion…

1. Title search Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.
2. After all fields search went to subject audiobook.
3. It came up with no audiobook results so I asked what my sister would do if she suspected there were audiobooks in this title but the results weren’t coming up. She of course was being smart and went to do a google search but I instructed her to borrow it from the local library.
4. She then went to advance search and entered the title author. She went outside the library website to check the spelling of authors name. A multitude of results came up and among the different types of materials was an audiobook in that title. I then instructed my sister to borrow the material.
5. The subject found that the borrowing link was not clear on gccc site – needs clarification or maybe more explanation.
6. New window -> click on borrow -> login.
7. Clicked download – went to open and it prompted for either windows of the computer to open a program or web service. No help offered.
8. Sister did a search how to open .odm files (zenway site) and download overdrive.
9. I prompted my sister to go back to the library site to get answers – there needs to be more guidance here.
10. I told her to head back to overdrive -> downloaded to windows -> picked operating system.
11. Clicked on program -> agreed and installed -> went to file folder  -> clicked on file overdrive, opened as default -> mad a new folder for audiobooks.
12. I prompted my sister to download the files.

At the end of the task my sister said she regretted helping me with the task – siblings…

Following the task I found that I probably offered too much direction and while I was viewing the user, my own feelings and assumptions were being transcribed. I should’ve followed up the observation with an interview asking about how my sister felt about different steps or processes. In my observation I should’ve also paid more attention to the facial expressions and body language of the user as opposed to the steps taken in the task.

Journal Entry - Week Two: What you have learned about the role of the user and the user experience in database design and development? What does this mean for information organisation? In your own database design (which you will do for assignment 3) how might you go about finding out user needs? You might also like to include some of your findings from the observation/interview with the user your interviewed.

Through the learning activities carried out this week and the in class content several discoveries were made regarding the role of the user and the user experience in database design and development. The key points I found were:
-          users play an integral role in design and development because their views on services or products encourage improvement and innovation
-          each user has a unique experience and each perspective has to be considered in the design process
-          there are a number of tools that can be used to find out about users’ experiences including interviews, observations and when in the investigatory role it’s important to remain impartial

Information organisation will be reliant on the role of the user to remain relevant. Services and products will be developed to suit users so experiences organisations are considered valuable. A good representation of the value of companies considering user experiences is demonstrated through Stephen Anderson’s User Experience Pyramid (see Figure 1.1 below).
Figure 1.1 Stephen Anderson’s User Experience Pyramid.


For Assignment 3, when constructing my own database, I will use several methods to find out about user needs including:
-          online research about what people look for in a database
-          iinterviews
-          observations
-          review elements of what makes up good user experiences and verify these against what users have said about their experiences with databases and database content

Some elements I may incorporate into my database that were of issue in the ‘Do’ activity include:
-          clear instructions/ clear help guides
-          make sure formats correspond correctly or how users expect entries to correspond
-          maybe a “did you mean?” component in case search entries are misspelled

I think when developing my database content will also be a key consideration.

References:

User Experience pyramid [Image]. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://contrast.ie/blog/make-it-meaningful/
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Week 4 – Learning Activities + Journal Entry

Watch: Watch the following two videos (“The right way to wireframe” – 1:34 min and “The right way to wireframe” – 3:12 min) demonstrating the process of how two different designers go about organising the web site layout and information architecture for the same website using wireframes.

The process of organising the website layout and information architecture for the same website using wireframes was fairly similar across the two different designers. Both designers undertook a rigorous planning stage mapping out their ideas and while aesthetically there was some differences in terms of colour scheme the content placement was very similar. It probably would’ve been easier to compare the two processes if the 1:34 video ran slower and each phase was earmarked similar to that of the three minute video.

Read:

Garrett, J. J. (2011). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web and beyond. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

Downey, L. & Banerjee, S. (2010). Building an information architecture checklist. Journal of Information Architecture, 2(2). Retrieved from: http://journalofia.org/volume2/issue2/03-downey/ 

McManus, M. (2009). What is information architecture? [Web log post]. Retrieved from:  http://www.maya.com/the-feed/what-is-information-architecture

Do: Visit the 3 local council websites listed below:
Melbourne City Council:  http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/
Hobart City Council:  http://www.hobartcity.com.au/ 
Perth City Council:  http://www.cityofperth.wa.gov.au/
Take notice of the way information is organised on each. What menu options are available on the right? What tabs are along the top? You should also find and look at the site map to see the overall high level information architecture of the site. How is this arranged?

Melbourne City Council
Menu options on the right: Under a section titled ‘I want to…’ several options are listed and deal with council related issues locals would want for information on including parking permit applications, parking fine payments and pet registration renewal. Each link focus is outlined in detail.
Tabs along the top: Options to view other council websites and search the council page are available along the top of the page. Just below those are links to the ‘Contact Us’ page and the ‘Site Map’.
Site map (IA)/ arrangement: The site map is displayed in a three column list form with subject headings shown in blue text with related links following the respective heading in black text. The font colours are similar and being able to distinguish between a subject heading and a related link can be challenging as you scroll down the page. Despite this, the site map is in depth and has multiple options for users to select from.

Hobart City Council
Menu options on the right: Below the website search bar is a section titled ‘Popular Links’. The options listed in this section have blue headings that are followed by small ‘blurbs’ detailing the content related to the heading. Links include: ‘Employment’, ‘Pay Online’, ‘Salamanca Markets’ and a ‘Customer Service Charter’.
Tabs along the top: The tabs along the top include ‘Home’, ‘Contact Us’, ‘Site Map’ and a link displayed as a Japanese flag that connects to details regarding Hobart’s sister city Yaizu. I thought this was an interesting addition to the links at the top of the page.
Site map (IA)/ arrangement: The site map is displayed as a single list with major headings larger in size to the related subheading links that are listed below each respective major heading. There are also indented links below some of the subheadings. Important website links are presented in the list first. Each major heading is followed by a comprehensive list of links to information.

Perth City Council
Menu options on the right:
Tabs along the top:
Site map (IA)/ arrangement:

On each Council website, try to navigate to the section about pet ownership. Consider:
·                                 How did you get there?
·                                 What decisions did you need to make to find the  information? 
·                                 How did the language differ on each site? 
·                                 What if you wanted a cat or chickens instead of a dog?
Lastly, of the three Council sites, which do you feel has the best information organisation? Which provided you with the best information? Which provided you with the best user experience? Did your answer change for these questions? Why?

Melbourne City Council
Steps taken/ decisions made to find pet ownership information:
Steps taken/ decisions made to find pet ownership information (animals other than dogs):

Hobart City Council
Steps taken/ decisions made to find pet ownership information:
Steps taken/ decisions made to find pet ownership information (animals other than dogs):

Perth City Counil
Steps taken/ decisions made to find pet ownership information:
Steps taken/ decisions made to find pet ownership information (animals other than dogs):

Language comparison between council sites:

Which council site has the best information organisation? Why?

Which site provided the best information? Why?

Which site provided the best user experience? Why?

Did the answer change for each question? Why?

Journal Entry – Week Four: In this entry you should critically consider the key points you have learnt about information organisation for websites and information architecture from this week's activity. You might like to focus on: How does information architecture impact on information findability? What needs to be taken into consideration when designing a website's information architecture? How does this then translate into the final website? You might also like to address some of the questions posed under the 'do' activity.

A number of things have to be considered when designing a website’s information architecture including:
- classification and hierarchy
- labels and tagging
- navigation and wayfinding and
- search (Thompson, 2010)

The goal is to make information as “findable” as possible. If these facets aren’t utilised or aren’t managed correctly then information architecture can have a negative impact on the findability of a website.

Not only this, but I believe the organisation of information, and in turn the findability of information, on a website can be dependent on the following factors:
- the needs and wants of the user
- aligning with the company’s strategic goals
- the context / content
- elements that make up good user experiences including ease of use and credibility (Morville, 2004)

Information findability can be influenced through information architecture and organisation because of the considerations that have to be made and balanced. If there is imbalance, particularly if user needs aren’t being carefully considered and the focus is on organisational “wants”, information won’t be clear and navigational challenges will arise. This view stems from the right hand menus of the council websites that were analysed as part of the ‘Do’ activity. I felt, as a user, the Melbourne City Council was more in touch with community needs as the topics addressed in the menu were relevant and put in understandable terms. In comparison, the Hobart City Council website seemed to have more of a focus on advertising the council and local attractions as opposed to informing the community about important council related issues.

References:
Morville, P. (2004). User Experience Design. Retrieved from http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php/


Thompson, M. (2010). Explain IA Poster [Image]. Retrieved from http://userallusion.com/blog/2010/10/explain-ia-poster/

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Week 6 – Learning Activities + Journal Entry

Watch: “Resource description”. Thoughts?

Read: Two resources outlined in weekly learning materials. Notes will be presented as scanned documents.

Zabel, D. & Miller, L. (2011). Resource description and access (RDA): An introduction for reference librarians. Reference and User Services       Quarterly, 50(3), 216-222. Retrieved from: http://rusa.metapress.com/content/wrg1501514721g7n/

This article talks about the history of RDA, how it operates, how it differs from the AARC2 cataloging code, why its implementation is being considered and the associated challenges of it's implementation. What I found most interesting is the focus the RDA code has on users through association with FRBR principles (FISO) even though there have been reportedly no studies of users involved in the defining of these principles (Miller, 2011). 

Park, J. & Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria and interoperability. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3), 104-116. Retrieved from: https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/3136/2750

Do: This week complete the Week 6: Resource Description activity attached. In this you will have to activities that explore the key issues associated with ISBD and also compare AACR2 and RDA. This sheet will also assist you in starting to consider various aspects of resource description for Assignment 3.

How many areas of description are there in ISBD, irrespective of type of material? What are these areas?

Eight - based in ISBD (G). Title and statement of responsibility area (1), edition area (2), material (or type of resource) specific area (3), publication, distribution, etc., area (4), physical description area (5), series area (6), note area (7), standard number (or alternative) and terms of availability area (8).

Compare what is said about ‘Sources of information’ in ISBD (G) and any two of the particular ISBD formats

Search the QUT library catalogue for the book by Robin Mason titled ‘Globalising education’. How should the record be displayed according to ISBD(M)? How many of the areas of description are used?

Now search and view the record for the video ‘Lantana’. Compare the QUT record for this item with the record held in the Brisbane City Council Library Service.

Have they been described at the same AACR2 level? To what extent can you check whether they follow ISBD?

Is ‘Lantana’ described according to ISBD on the Internet Movie Database?

Look at and compare the two records below for the same illustrated childrens’ book, using AACR2 and RDA respectively. What do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of the presentation of each of these?

First as a user and then as an information professional, consider -  do you have a preference? If so, which one and why?

AACR2
Kontis, Alethea.
Alpha oops! : the day Z went first / Alethea Kontis ; illustrated by Bob Kolar.
1st ed.
Cambridge, Mass. : Candlewick Press, c2006.
1 v. : col. Ill. ; 28cm.
Chaos ensues when Z thinks that it’s time for him to go first in the alphabet for a change.
Kolar, Bob, ill.

RDA
Kontis, Althea, author.
Alpha oops! : the day Z went first / Alethea Kontis ; illustrated by Bob Kolar.
First edition.
Cambridge, Massachusetts : Candlewick Press, [2006], ©2006.
37 unnumbered pages: color illustration ; 28cm.
text rdacontent
unmediated rdamedia
volume rdacarrier
Chaos ensues when Z thinks that it’s time for him to go first in the alphabet for a change.
Kolar, Bob, illustrator.


Journal Entry – Week 6: In this entry you should critically consider the key points you have learnt about resource description from this week's activities. You may consider reflecting upon what do you think are the key factors in considering how you will structure bibliographic resource description and the standards you will use? From what you have read and learned - what do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of using RDA over AACR2? Consider what this move to RDA means in regard to the evolution of information organisation.

From this week's activities I've learned several things about resource description. 

No comments:

Post a Comment